Truth at the Limits of Conceptual Engineering

Mariona Eiren Miyata-Sturm

doi:10.14394/filnau.2023.0020

Autor

Mariona Eiren Miyata-Sturm University of Oxford, Faculty of Philosophy https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7260-9232

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14394/filnau.2023.0020

Słowa kluczowe:

conceptual engineering, amelioration, truth, concepts, conceptual change

Abstrakt

Interest in conceptual engineering – the project of evaluating and ameliorating concepts – has increased dramatically in recent years. One still underexplored question is whether there are any limits to conceptual engineering: are some concepts immune to revision or replacement? Here I discuss two arguments to the effect that the concept of truth cannot be engineered. Both are based on a thought experiment by Eklund (2015), who suggests that TRUTH might spell one of the limits of conceptual engineering. He does not give a full-blown argument in favor of this, so the arguments I consider are based on two ways of interpreting his comments. Neither, I argue, supports the claim that TRUTH cannot be engineered.

Bibliografia

Asay J. (2013), The Primitivist Theory of Truth, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Asay J. (2021), “TRUTH: A Concept Unlike Any Other,” Synthese 2(Suppl 2), 605–630. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-017-1661-z

Bar-On D. and Simmons K. (2007), The Use of Force Against Deflationism: Assertion and Truth, [in:] Truth and Speech Acts: Studies in the Philosophy of Language, D. Greimann and G. Siegwart (eds.), New York: Routledge, 61–89.

Brigandt I. (2010), “The Epistemic Goal of a Concept: Accounting for The Rationality of Semantic Change and Variation,” Synthese 177, 19–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-009-9623-8

Brown J. and Cappelen H., eds. (2011), Assertion: New Philosophical Essays, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Burgess A. (2013), “Keeping ‘True’: A Case Study in Conceptual Ethics,” Inquiry 57(5–6), 580–606. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2013.851866

Burgess A., Cappelen H., and Plunkett D., eds. (2020), Conceptual Ethics and Conceptual Engineering, Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198801856.001.0001

Burgess A. and Plunkett D. (2013a), “Conceptual Ethics I,” Philosophy Compass 8(12), 1091–1101. https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12086

Burgess A. and Plunkett D. (2013b), “Conceptual Ethics II,” Philosophy Compass 8(12), 1102–1110. https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12085

Cappelen H. (2011), Against Assertion, [in:] Assertion: New Philosophical Essays, J. Brown and H. Cappelen (eds.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 21–47.

Cappelen H. (2018), Fixing Language: An Essay on Conceptual Engineering, Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198814719.001.0001

Cappelen H. and Plunkett D. (2020), Introduction: A Guided Tour of Conceptual Engineering and Conceptual Ethics, [in:] Conceptual Engineering and Conceptual Ethics, A. Burgess, H. Cappelen, and D. Plunkett (eds.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198801856.003.0001

Chan T., ed. (2013), The Aim of Belief, Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199672134.001.0001

Davidson D. (1996), “The Folly of Trying to Define Truth,” The Journal of Philosophy 93(6), 263–278. https://doi.org/10.2307/2941075

Díaz León E. (2020), Descriptive vs. Ameliorative Projects: The Role of Normative Considerations, [in:] Conceptual Engineering and Conceptual Ethics, A. Burgess, H. Cappelen, and D. Plunkett (eds.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 170–186. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198801856.003.0009

Dummett M. (1993), The Seas of Language, Oxford: Clarendon Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0198236212.001.0001

Eklund M. (2012), The Multitude View on Logic, [in:] New Waves in Philosophical Logic, G. Restall and G. Russell (eds.), London: Palgrave Macmillan, 217–240. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137003720_12

Eklund M. (2014), Replacing Truth? [in:] Metasemantics: New Essays on The Foundations of Meaning, A. Burgess and B. Sherman (eds.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 293–310.

Eklund M. (2015), Intuitions, Conceptual Engineering, and Conceptual Fixed Points, [in:] The Palgrave Handbook of Philosophical Methods, C. Daly (ed.), London: Palgrave Macmillan, 363–385. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137344557_15

Eklund M. (2020), “The Existence of Personites,” Philosophical Studies 177, 2051–2071. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-019-01298-w

Eklund M. (2023), “Possible Limits to Conceptual Engineering: Magnetism, Fixed Points and Inescapability,” Argumenta 8(2), 339–356. https://doi.org/10.14275/2465-2334/202316.ekl

Fodor J. A. (1998), Concepts: Where Cognitive Science Went Wrong, Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0198236360.001.0001

Fodor J. A. (2008), LOT2: The Language of Thought Revisited, Oxford: Clarendon Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199548774.001.0001

Frege G. (1918/1997), The Thought, [in:] The Frege Reader, M. Beaney (ed.), Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 324–345.

Green M. S. (2017), Assertion, [in:] Oxford Handbooks Online, D. Pritchard (ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Greenough P. (2019), “Conceptual Marxism and Truth: Inquiry Symposium on Kevin Scharp’s Replacing Truth,” Inquiry 62(4), 403–421. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2017.1287919

Haslanger S. (2000), “Gender and Race: (What) Are They? (What) Do We Want Them to Be?” Noûs 34(1), 31–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/0029-4624.00201

Haslanger S. (2012), Resisting Reality, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Haslanger S. (2020a), Going on, Not in the Same Way, [in:] Conceptual Ethics and Conceptual Engineering, A. Burgess, H. Cappelen, and D. Plunkett (eds.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 230–260. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198801856.003.0012

Haslanger S. (2020b), How Not to Change the Subject, [in:] Shifting Concepts: The Philosophy and Psychology of Conceptual Variability, T. Marques and Å. Wikforss (eds.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 235–259. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198803331.003.0013

Horwich P. (2010), Truth – Meaning – Reality, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Isaac M. G. (2020), “How to Conceptually Engineer Conceptual Engineering?” Inquiry, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2020.1719881

Kölbel M. (2008), “‘True’ as Ambiguous,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 77(2), 359–384. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1933-1592.2008.00195.x

Kripke S. (1980), Naming and Necessity, Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.

Lewis D. (1983), “New Work for a Theory of Universals,” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 61(4), 343–377. https://doi.org/10.1080/00048408312341131

Lynch M. (2009), Truth as One and Many, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Machery E. (2009), Doing without Concepts, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

MacPherson T. and Plunkett D. (2020), Conceptual Ethics and The Methodology of Normative Inquiry, [in:] Conceptual Ethics and Conceptual Engineering, A. Burgess, H. Cappelen, and D. Plunkett (eds.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 274–303. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198801856.003.0014

Margolis E. and Laurence S., eds. (1999), Concepts: Core Readings, Cambridge and London: MIT Press.

Marques T. (2020), Amelioration vs Perversion, [in:] Shifting Concepts: The Philosophy and Psychology of Conceptual Variability, T. Marques and Å. Wikforss (eds.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 260–284. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198803331.003.0014

Millikan R. G. (2000), On Clear and Confused Ideas: An Essay About Substance Concepts, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511613296

Murphy G. L. (2002), The Big Book of Concepts, Cambridge and London: MIT Press.

Nado J. (2019), “Conceptual Engineering, Truth, and Efficacy,” Synthese 198(Suppl 7), 1507–1527. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-019-02096-x

Pagin P. (2011), Information and Assertoric Force, [in:] Assertion: New Philosophical Essays, J. Brown and H. Cappelen (eds.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 97–135.

Peacocke C. (1992), A Study of Concepts, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Prinz J. (2002), Furnishing the Mind: Concepts and Their Perceptual Basis, Cambridge–London: MIT Press.

Prinzig M. (2018), “The Revisionist’s Rubric: Conceptual Engineering and the Discontinuity Objection,” Inquiry 61(8), 854–880. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2017.1385522

Rähme B. (2014), An Explanatory Role for the Concept of Truth, [in:] New Frontiers in Truth, F. Bacchini, S. Caputo, and M. Dell’Utri (eds.), Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Press, 15–37.

Sawyer S. (2020), “Truth and Objectivity in Conceptual Engineering,” Inquiry 63(9-10), 1001–1022. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2020.1805708

Scharp K. (2013), Replacing Truth, Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199653850.001.0001

Scharp K. (2020), “Conceptual Engineering for Truth: Aletheic Properties and New Aletheic Concepts,” Synthese 198(Suppl 2), 647–688. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-019-02491-4

Shah N. and Velleman J. D. (2005), “Doxastic Deliberation,” The Philosophical Review 114(4), 497–534. https://doi.org/10.1215/00318108-114-4-497

Sider T. (2011), Writing the Book of the World, Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Stich S. P. (1990), The Fragmentation of Reason: Preface to a Pragmatic Theory of Cognitive Evaluation, Cambridge–London: MIT Press.

Strawson P. F. (1963), Carnap’s Views on Conceptual Systems Versus Natural Languages in Analytic Philosophy, [in:] The Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap, P. A. Schilpp (ed.), Chicago, IL: Open Court, 503–518.

Tarski A. (1944), “The Semantic Conception of Truth and the Foundations of Semantics,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 4(3), 341–376. https://doi.org/10.2307/2102968

Thomasson A. L. (2020), A Pragmatic Method for Normative Conceptual Work, [in:] Conceptual Ethics and Conceptual Engineering, A. Burgess, H. Cappelen, and D. Plunkett (eds.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 435–458. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198801856.003.0021

Wright C. (1994), Truth and Objectivity, Harvard: Harvard University Press.