Epistemological Controversies over Randomized Controlled Trials Subgroup Analysis

Authors

  • Tomasz Rzepiński Institute of Philosophy, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań

Keywords:

clinical trials, epistemology of medicine, statistical relevance, subgroup analysis

Abstract

Subgroup analysis is one of the methods used in contemporary methodology of medicine for assessing the effects of undertaken therapy. It is often claimed that researchers who use the method overestimate its epistemic value. The main purpose of this paper is to analyze the credibility of conclusions formulated on the basis of subgroup analysis. Its findings will help to better understand the epistemological limitations of this method as well as to clarify its function in clinical trials.

Published

2016-12-01

How to Cite

Rzepiński, T. (2016). Epistemological Controversies over Randomized Controlled Trials Subgroup Analysis. The Philosophy of Science, 24(4), 73–94. Retrieved from https://fn.uw.edu.pl/index.php/fn/article/view/833