In Response to „Pseudo-Facts and Pseudo-Myths”
Keywords:
proper names, new theory of reference, descriptionismAbstract
The paper is a response to Tadeusz Ciecierski’s „Pseudo-Facts and Pseudo-Myths”. Ciecierski argues that the arguments in favor of the New Theory of Reference are sound because they (and the theory itself) concern the class of expressions that have a direct reference, and not proper names. It is argued that those arguments are implausible in such interpretation, because they take as premises some intuitions about proper names (and not about expressions that have a direct reference).
Downloads
Published
2009-06-01
How to Cite
Hess, L. (2009). In Response to „Pseudo-Facts and Pseudo-Myths”. The Philosophy of Science, 17(2), 139–141. Retrieved from https://fn.uw.edu.pl/index.php/fn/article/view/573
Issue
Section
Polemics