The Engineer, the Scientist, and the Philosopher: Conceptual Engineering as an Applied Science

István Danka

doi:10.14394/filnau.2023.0021

Authors

István Danka Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Department of Philosophy and History of Science https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8946-2556

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14394/filnau.2023.0021

Keywords:

conceptual engineering, metaphilosophy, philosophical methodology, internal and external purposes, fundamental research and applied science

Abstract

This paper argues that the metaphor of philosophy as conceptual engineering should be better exploited. Conceptual engineers describe their activity as analogous to engineering activities; however, as I will show, some disanalogies can be identified in terms of the purposes of these activities (as described). Engineering has multiple purposes, many of which are external to engineering activity. This applicative part of the metaphor needs further elaboration: conceptual engineering should also pursue purposes external to the profession.

First, I shall show how conceptual engineers understand the notion of conceptual engineering and the philosophical methodology this notion implies. Second, I shall further motivate the engineering analogy through the use of metaphilosophical considerations. Third, I shall point to weaknesses in the present form of the analogy between technological and conceptual engineering. I will show that conceptual engineering often seems to copy the work of a physicist rather than a proper engineer. This picture of philosophers as scientists is not as novel as the term “conceptual engineering” would indicate. Engineering is an applied science rather than fundamental research. This characteristic should be better exploited when applied to conceptual work. Finally, I will provide descriptive and normative reasons for the applied science approach to conceptual engineering and respond to some possible objections.

References

Belleri D. (2021), “Downplaying the Change of Subject Objection to Conceptual Engineering,” Inquiry, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2021.1908161

Blackburn S. (1999), Think: A Compelling Introduction into Philosophy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Burgess A., Cappelen H., and Plunkett D., eds. (2020), Conceptual Engineering and Conceptual Ethics, Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198801856.001.0001

Cappelen H. (2012), Philosophy Without Intuitions, Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199644865.001.0001

Cappelen H. (2018), Fixing Language: An Essay on Conceptual Engineering, Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198814719.001.0001

Chalmers D. J. (2020), “What Is Conceptual Engineering and What Should It Be?” Inquiry, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2020.1817141

Eklund M. (2014), Replacing Truth? [in:] Metasemantics: New Essays on the Foundations of Meaning, A. Burgess and B. Sherman (eds.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 293–310. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199669592.003.0012

Eklund M. (2015), Conceptual Engineering and Conceptual Fixed Points, [in:] The Palgrave Handbook of Philosophical Methods, C. Daly (ed.), London: MacMillan, 363–385. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137344557_15

Floridi L. (2011), “A Defence of Constructionism: Philosophy as Conceptual Engineering,” Metaphilosophy 42(3), 282–304. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9973.2011.01693.x

Haslanger S. (2000), “Gender and Race: (What) Are They? (What) Do We Want Them to Be?” Noûs 34, 31–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/0029-4624.00201

Haslanger S. (2020), Going On, Not in the Same Way, [in:] Conceptual Engineering and Conceptual Ethics, A. Burgess, H. Cappelen, and D. Plunkett (eds.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 230–260. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198801856.003.0012

Isaac M., Koch S., and Nefdt R. (2022), “Conceptual Engineering: A Road Map to Practice,” Philosophy Compass 17(10), e1287. https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12879

Isaac M. G. (2020), “How to Conceptually Engineer Conceptual Engineering?” Inquiry, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2020.1719881

Isaac M. G. and Koch S. (2022), “Foundational Issues in Conceptual Engineering: Introduction and Overview,” Inquiry. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2022.2028230

Isern-Mas C. (2023), “Implementing Conceptual Engineering: Lessons from Social Movements,” Inquiry, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2023.2253274

Jorem S. (2022), “The Good, the Bad and the Insignificant – Assessing Concept Functions for Conceptual Engineering,” Synthese 200, 106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-022-03548-7

Koch S. (2021), “Engineering What? On Concepts in Conceptual Engineering,” Synthese 199, 1955–1975. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-020-02868-w

Nado J. (2021), “Conceptual Engineering, Truth, and Efficacy,” Synthese 198(Suppl 7), 1507–1527. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-019-02096-x

Nimtz C. (2021), “Engineering Concepts by Engineering Social Norms: Solving the Implementation Challenge,” Inquiry 67(6), 1716–1743. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2021.1956368

Podosky P. (2022), “Can Conceptual Engineering Actually Promote Social Justice?” Synthese 200, 160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-022-03469-5

Prinzing M. (2017), “The Revisionist’s Rubric: Conceptual Engineering and the Discontinuity Objection,” Inquiry 61(8), 854–880. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2017.1385522

Queloz M. (2022), “Function-Based Conceptual Engineering and the Authority Problem,” Mind 131(524), 1247–1278. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/fzac028

Riggs J. (2021), “Deflating the Functional Turn in Conceptual Engineering,” Synthese 199, 11555–11586. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-021-03302-5

Rorty R. (1991), Essays on Heidegger and Others. Philosophical Papers Volume 2, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511609039

Simion M. (2018), “The Should in Conceptual Engineering,” Inquiry 61(8), 914–928. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2017.1392894

Simion M. and Kelp C. (2020), “Conceptual Innovation, Function First,” Noûs 54(4), 985–1002. https://doi.org/10.1111/nous.12302

Weber M. (1978), Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology, G. Roth and C. Wittich (eds.), Berkeley: University of California Press.