The Fourfold Route to Empirical Enlightenment: Experimental Philosophy’s Adolescence and the Changing Body of Work
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14394/filnau.2021.0012Keywords:
metaphilosophy, experimental philosophy, methodology, history of analytic philosophy, empirical philosophy, ordinary language philosophy, Arne Næss, J. L. AustinAbstract
The time has come to consider whether experimental philosophy’s (“x-phi”) early arguments, debates, and conceptual frameworks, that may have worn well in its early days, fit with the diverse range of projects undertaken by experimental philosophers. Our aim is to propose a novel taxonomy for x-phi that identifies four paths from empirical findings to philosophical consequences, which we call the “fourfold route.” We show how this taxonomy can be fruitfully applied even at what one might have taken to be the furthest edges of possible applications of x-phi in metaphysics and formal philosophy. Ultimately, the fourfold route helps us understand a different kind of empirical fact: the development of x-phi itself.
References
Adams F., Steadman A. (2004a), “Intentional Action in Ordinary Language: Core Concept or Pragmatic Understanding?,” Analysis 64(2), 173-181. https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/64.2.173
Adams F., Steadman A. (2004b), “Intentional Actions and Moral Considerations: Still Pragmatic,” Analysis 64(3), 268-276. https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/64.3.268
Alexander J. (2016), “Philosophical Expertise” [in:] A Companion to Experimental Philosophy, W. Buckwalter, J. Sytsma (eds.), Oxford: Wiley, 555-567. https://doi.org//10.1002/9781118661666.ch39
Alexander J., Weinberg J. (2006), “Analytic Epistemology and Experimental Philosophy,” Philosophy Compass 2, 56-80. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-9991.2006.00048.x
Alxatib S., Pelletier F. J. (2011), “The Psychology of Vagueness: Borderline Cases and Contradictions,” Mind and Language 26, 287-326. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.2011.01419.x
Andow J. (2020), “Fully Experimental Conceptual Engineering,” Inquiry, 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2020.1850339
Asay J. (2021), “Primitivism about Truth” [in:] The Nature of Truth: Classic and Contemporary Perspectives, N. Kellen, J. Kim, M. P. Lynch, J. Wyatt (eds.), 2nd ed., Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 525-538.
Austin J. L. (1979), “A Plea for Excuses” [in:] Philosophical Papers, J. O. Urmson, G. J. Warnock (eds.), Oxford: Clarendon Press, 175-203. https://doi.org/10.1093/019283021X.003.0008
Balaguer M. (2016), “Conceptual Analysis and X-Phi,” Synthese 193: 2367-2388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-015-0848-4
Barnard R., Ulatowski J. (2016), “Tarski’s 1944 Polemical Remarks and Næss’ ‘Experimental Philosophy’,” Erkenntnis 81(4), 457-477. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-015-9750-1
Barnard R., Ulatowski J., Weinberg J. (2017), “Thinking about the Liar, Fast and Slow” [in:] Reflections on the Liar, B. Armour-Garb (ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 39-70. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199896042.003.0003
Barwise J., Etchemendy J. (1987), The Liar: An Essay on Truth and Circularity, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Baz A. (2018), The Crisis of Method in Contemporary Analytic Philosophy, Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198801887.001.0001
Black M. (ed.) (1950), Philosophical Analysis: A Collection of Essays, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Block N., Stalnaker R. (1999), “Conceptual Analysis, Dualism, and the Explanatory Gap,” Philosophical Review 108, 1-46. https://doi.org/10.2307/2998259
Bonini N., Osherson D., Viale R., Williamson T. (1999), “On the Psychology of Vague Predicates,” Mind and Language 14, 377-393. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0017.00117
Buckland L., Lindauer M., Rodriguez-Arias D., Véliz C. (forthcoming), “Testing the Motivational Strength of Positive and Negative Duty Arguments Regarding Global Poverty,” Review of Philosophy and Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-021-00555-4
Buckwalter W. (2010), “Knowledge Isn’t Closed on Saturday: A Study in Ordinary Language,” Review of Philosophy and Psychology 1, 395-406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-010-0030-3
Buttelmann D., Buttelmann F., Carpenter M., Call J., Tomasello M. (2017), “Great Apes Distinguish True from False Beliefs in an Interactive Helping Task,” PLoS ONE 12(4): e0173793. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173793
Buttelmann D., Carpenter M., Tomasello M. (2009), “Eighteen-Month-Old Infants Show False Belief Understanding in an Active Helping Paradigm,” Cognition 112, 337-343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2009.05.006
Carnap R. (1955), “Meaning and Synonymy in Natural Languages,” Philosophical Studies 6(3): 33-47. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02330951
Chapman S. (2011), “Arne Næss and Empirical Semantics,” Inquiry 54(1), 18-30. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2011.542946
Chapman S. (2018), “The Experimental and the Empirical: Arne Næss’ Statistical Approach to Philosophy,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 26, 961-981. https://doi.org/10.1080/09608788.2017.1336075
Cullen S. (2010), “Survey-Driven Romanticism,” Review of Philosophy and Psychology 1(3): 275-296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-009-0016-1
Cushman F. (2007), “The Effect of Moral Judgment on Causal and Intentional Attribution: What We Say, or How We Think?,” unpublished manuscript, Harvard University.
DeBrigard F. (2010), “If You Like It, Does It Matter If It’s Real?,” Philosophical Psychology 23(1), 43-57. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515080903532290
Daniels N. (1979), “Wide Reflective Equilibrium and Theory Acceptance in Ethics,” Journal of Philosophy 76(5), 256-282. https://doi.org/10.2307/2025881
DeRose K. (2005), “The Ordinary Language Basis for Contextualism, and the New Invariantism,” Philosophical Quarterly 55, 172-198. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0031-8094.2005.00394.x
Deutsch M. (2015), The Myth of the Intuitive, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262028950.001.0001
Egré P., Zehr J. (2018), “Are Gaps Preferred to Gluts? A Closer Look at Borderline Contradictions” [in:] The Semantics of Gradability, Vagueness, and Scale Structure,
E. Castroviejo, L. McNally, G. Weidman Sassoon (eds.), Dordrecht: Springer, 25-58. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77791-7_2
Feltz A., Zapertine C. (2010), “Do You Know More When It Matters Less?,” Philosophical Psychology 23(5), 683-706. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2010.514572
Fischer E. (2014), “Verbal Fallacies and Philosophical Intuitions: The Continuing Relevance of Ordinary Language Analysis” [in:] Austin on Language, B. Garvey (ed.), Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, 124-140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-019-02081-4
Fischer E., Engelhardt P., Horvath J., Ohtani H. (2019), “Experimental Ordinary Language Philosophy: A Cross-linguistic Study of Defeasible Default Inferences,” Synthese 198(2): 1029-1070. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-019-02081-4
Fraser A. (1891), “Visualization as a Chief Source of the Psychology of Hobbes, Locke, Berkeley, and Hume,” The American Journal of Psychology 4, 230-247. https://doi.org/10.2307/1411269
Fraser A. (1893), “The Psychological Basis of Hegelism,” The American Journal of Psychology 5, 472-495. https://doi.org/10.2307/1411914
Gendler T. (2000), “The Puzzle of Imaginative Resistance,” The Journal of Philosophy 97, 55-81. https://doi.org/10.2307/2678446
Gerken M., Beebe J. R. (2016), “Knowledge In and Out of Contrast,” Noûs 50, 133-164. https://doi.org/10.1111/nous.12064
Goldman A. (1979), “What is Justified Belief?” [in:] Justification and Knowledge, G. Pappas (ed.), The Hague: Reidel. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9493-5_1
Gonnerman C., Ulatowski J., Sytsma J. (forthcoming), “The History and Philosophy of Experimental Philosophy” [in:] Complete Compendium of Experimental Philosophy, M. Bauer (ed.), New York: Continuum.
Goodman N. (1983), Fact, Fiction, and Forecast, 4th ed., Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Greene J. (2008), “The Secret Joke of Kant’s Soul” [in:] Moral Psychology, vol. 3: The Neuroscience of Morality: Emotion, Brain Disorders, and Development, W. Sinnott-Armstrong (ed.), Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 35-79.
Greene J. (2013), Moral Tribes: Emotion, Reason, and the Gap Between Us and Them, New York: Penguin.
Hansen N., Chemla E. (2015), “Linguistic Experiments and Ordinary Language Philosophy,” Ratio 28(4), 422-445. https://doi.org/10.1111/rati.12112
Hansen N., Porter J. D., Francis K. (2019), “A Corpus Study of ‘Know’: On the Verification of Philosophers’ Frequency Claims about Language,” Episteme, 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1017/epi.2019.15
Hewitt S. (2010), “What Do Our Intuitions about the Experience Machine Really Tell Us about Hedonism?,” Philosophical Studies 151(3), 331-349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-009-9440-4
Horowitz T. (1998), “Philosophical Intuitions and Psychological Theory,” Ethics 108, 367-385. https://doi.org/10.1086/233809
Horne Z., Livengood J. (2017), “Ordering Effects, Updating Effects, and the Specter of Global Skepticism,” Synthese 194, 1189-1218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-015-0985-9
Horschler D. J., MacLean E. L., Santos L. R. (2020), “Do Non-human Primates Really Represent Others’ Beliefs?,” Trends in Cognitive Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2020.05.009
Horvath J. (2010), “How (Not) to React to Experimental Philosophy,” Philosophical Psychology 23(4), 447-480. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2010.505878
Ichikawa J. (2009), “Explaining Away Intuitions,” Studia Philosophica Estonica 2, 94-116. https://doi.org/10.12697/spe.2009.2.2.06
Irikefe P. O. (2020), “A Fresh Look at the Expertise Reply to the Variation Problem,” Philosophical Psychology 33, 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2020.1761541
Jackson F. (1998), From Metaphysics to Ethics: A Defence of Conceptual Analysis, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jago M. (2018), What is Truth?, Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198823810.001.0001
Kahneman D., Tversky A. (1982), “The Psychology of Preferences,” Scientific American 246, 136-142. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0182-160
Kelly D. (2011), Yuck! The Nature and Moral Significance of Disgust, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/8303.001.0001
Kelly D. (2018), “Cast in a Bad Light or Reflected in a Dark Mirror? Cognitive Science and the Projecting Mind” [in:] The Moral Psychology of Disgust, N. Strohminger, V. Kumar (eds.), London: Routledge, 171-194.
Kim M., Yuan Y. (2015), “No Cross-cultural Differences in the Gettier Car Case Intuition: A Replication Study of Weinberg et al. 2001,” Episteme 12(3): 355-361. https://doi.org/10.1017/epi.2015.17
Kneer M., Colaço D., Alexander J., Machery E. (forthcoming), “On Second Thought: Reflections on the Reflection Defense” [in:] Oxford Studies in Experimental Philosophy, J. Knobe, S. Nichols, T. Gendler (eds.), Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Knetsch J. L. (1989), “The Endowment Effect and Evidence of Nonreversible Indifference Curves,” American Economic Review 79, 1277-1284.
Knobe J. (2003). “Intentional Action and Side Effects in Ordinary Language,” Analysis 63(3), 190-193. https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/63.3.190
Knobe J. (2004), “Intention, Intentional Action and Moral Considerations,” Analysis 64(2), 181-187. https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/64.2.181
Knobe J. (2016), “Experimental Philosophy is Cognitive Science” [in:] A Companion to Experimental Philosophy, W. Buckwalter, J. Sytsma (eds.), Oxford: Wiley, 37-52. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118661666.ch3
Koch S. (2019), “Carnapian Explications, Experimental Philosophy, and Fruitful Concepts,” Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 62(6), 700-717. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2019.1567381
Koch S. (2020), “Engineering What? On Concepts in Conceptual Engineering,” Synthese 199, 1955-1975. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-020-02868-w
Kripke S. (1980), Naming and Necessity, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Lillehammer H. (ed.) (forthcoming), The Trolley Problem, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lindauer M. (2020), “Experimental Philosophy and the Fruitfulness of Normative Concepts,” Philosophical Studies 177(8), 2129-2152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-019-01302-3
Machery E. (2008), “The Folk Concept of Intentional Action: Philosophical and Experimental Issues,” Mind and Language 23(2), 165-189. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.2007.00336.x
Machery E., Mallon R., Nichols S., Stich S. P. (2004), “Semantics, Cross-Cultural Style,” Cognition 92, B1-B12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2003.10.003
Machery E., Stich S., Rose D., Chatterjee A., Karasawa K., Struchiner N., Sirker S., Usui N., Hashimoto T. (2017), “Gettier across Cultures,” Noûs 51(3), 645-664. https://doi.org/10.1111/nous.12110
Maudlin T. (2008), Truth and Paradox: Solving the Riddles, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
May J., Sinnott-Armstrong W., Hull J. G., Zimmerman A. (2010), “Practical Interests, Relevant Alternatives, and Knowledge Attributions: An Empirical Study,” Review of Philosophy and Psychology 1(2), 265-273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-009-0014-3
McKenna M., Pereboom D. (2014), Free Will: A Contemporary Introduction, London: Routledge.
Meskin A., Weinberg J. (2012), “Imagination Unblocked” [in:] The Aesthetic Mind: Philosophy and Psychology, E. Schellekens, P. Goldie (eds.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 239-253. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199691517.003.0014
Moore J. (1939), Review of A. Næss: “Truth” as Conceived by Those Who Are Not Professional Philosophers, The American Journal of Psychology 52, 489-490. https://doi.org/10.2307/1416771
Nadelhoffer T., Nahmias E., Morris S., Turner J. (2004). “The Phenomenology of Free Will,” Journal of Consciousness Studies 11(7-8), 162-179.
Nadelhoffer T., Nahmias E. (2007), “The Past and Future of Experimental Philosophy,” Philosophical Explorations 10, 123-149. https://doi.org/10.1080/13869790701305921
Nadelhoffer T., Shepard J., Crone D. L., Everett J. A. C., Earp B. D., Levy N. (2020), “Does Encouraging a Belief in Determinism Increase Cheating? Reconsidering the Value of Believing in Free Will,” Cognition 203, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104342
Nado J. (2014), “Philosophical Expertise,” Philosophy Compass 9, 631-641. https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12154
Nado J. (2015), “Philosophical Expertise and Scientific Expertise,” Philosophical Psychology 28, 1026-1044. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2014.961186
Nado J. (2017), “How To Think About Philosophical Methodology,” Journal of Indian Council of Philosophical Research 34, 447-463. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40961-017-0116-8
Nado J. (2021), “Conceptual Engineering via Experimental Philosophy,” Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 64(1-2), 76-96. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2019.1667870
Næss A. (1938a), “Truth” as Conceived by Those Who Are Not Professional Philosophers (Skrifter Utgitt av Det Norske Videnskaps-Akademi I Oslo Il. Hist.-Filos. Klass 1938 No. 4), Oslo: I Komisjon Hos Jacob Dybwad.
Næss A. (1938b), “Common-Sense and Truth,” Theoria 4, 39-58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-2567.1938.tb00438.x
Næss A. (1953), “Toward a Theory of Interpretation and Preciseness,” Theoria 15, 220-241. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-2567.1949.tb00152.x
Nagel E. (1939), Review of: A. Næss, “Truth” as Conceived by Those Who Are Not Professional Philosophers, Journal of Philosophy 36, 78-80. https://doi.org/10.2307/2017766
Nahmias E., Morris S., Nadelhoffer T., Turner J. (2006), “Is Incompatibilism Intuitive?,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 73(1), 28-53. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1933-1592.2006.tb00603.x
Nichols S., Knobe J. (2007), “Moral Responsibility and Determinism: The Cognitive Science of Folk Intuitions,” Noûs 41(4), 663-685. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0068.2007.00666.x
Nichols S., Roskies A. (2008), “Bringing Moral Responsibility Down to Earth,” The Journal of Philosophy 105(7), 371-388. https://doi.org/10.5840/jphil2008105737
Nichols S., Ulatowski J. (2007), “Intuitions and Individual Differences: The Knobe Effect Revisited,” Mind and Language 22(3), 346-365. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.2007.00312.x
Nozick R. (1974), Anarchy, State, and Utopia, New York: Basic Books.
Nozick R. (1989), The Examined Life, New York: Touchstone Books.
Paprzycka-Hausman K. (2015), “The Omissions Account of the Knobe Effect and the Asymmetry Challenge,” Mind and Language 30(5), 550-571. https://doi.org/10.1111/mila.12090
Paul L. (2010), “A New Role for Experimental Work in Metaphysics,” Review of Philosophy and Psychology 1, 461-476. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-010-0034-z
Pinder M. (2017a), “The Explication Defence of Arguments from Reference,” Erkenntnis 82(6), 1253-1276. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-016-9868-9
Pinder M. (2017b), “Does Experimental Philosophy Have a Role to Play in Carnapian Explication?,” Ratio 30(4), 443-461. https://doi.org/10.1111/rati.12164
Pinillos N. Á., Smith N., Nair G. S., Marchetto P., Mun C. (2011), “Philosophy’s New Challenge: Experiments and Intentional Action,” Mind and Language 26, 115-139. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.2010.01412.x
Plakias A. (2015), “Experimental Philosophy,” Oxford Handbook Online, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199935314.013.17
Priest G. (1997), “Sylvan’s Box: A Short Story and Ten Morals,” Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 38, 573-582. https://doi.org/10.1305/ndjfl/1039540770
Rawls J. (1971), A Theory of Justice, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rini R. (2015), “How Not to Test for Expertise,” Synthese 192, 431-452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-014-0579-y
Ripley D. (2011), “Contradictions at the Borders” [in:] Vagueness in Communication, R. Nouwen, R. an Rooij, U. Sauerland, H-C. Schmitz (eds.), Dordrecht: Springer, 169-188. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-18446-8_10
Ripley D. (2016), “Experimental Philosophical Logic” [in:] A Companion to Experimental Philosophy, W. Buckwalter, J. Sytsma (eds.), Oxford: Wiley, 523-534. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118661666.ch36
Rose D. (2015), “Belief is Prior to Knowledge,” Episteme 12(3), 385-399. https://doi.org/10.1017/epi.2015.21
Rowland R. (2017), “Our Intuitions about the Experience Machine,” Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 12, 110-117. https://doi.org/10.26556/jesp.v12i1.216
Russell B. (1923), “Vagueness,” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 1, 84-92. https://doi.org/10.1080/00048402308540623
Samuelson W., Zeckhauser R. (1988), “Status Quo Bias in Decision Making,” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 1(1), 7-59. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00055564
Schubach J. (2017), “Explanatory Explication,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 94(3), 672-710. https://doi.org/10.1111/phpr.12207
Schubach J. (2018), “Robustness Analysis as Explanatory Reasoning,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 69, 275-300. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axw008
Schwitzgebel E. (2009), “Do Ethicists Steal More Books?,” Philosophical Psychology 22, 711-725. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515080903409952
Schwitzgebel E., Cokelet B., Singer P. (forthcoming), “Do Ethics Classes Influence Student Behavior? Case Study: Teaching the Ethics of Eating Meat,” Cognition.
Schwitzgebel E., Rust J. (2012), “The Behavior of Ethicists” [in:] A Companion to Experimental Philosophy, W. Buckwalter, J. Sytsma (eds.), Oxford: Wiley, 225-233. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118661666.ch15
Schwitzgebel E., Rust J., Huang L., Moore A., Coates J. (2012), “Ethicists’ Courtesy at Philosophy Conferences,” Philosophical Psychology 35, 331-340. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2011.580524
Shearman A. T. (1907), “Intuition,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 7, 158-197. https://doi.org/10.1093/aristotelian/7.1.158
Shepherd J., Justus J. (2015), “X-Phi and Carnapian Explication,” Erkenntnis 80(2), 381-402. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-014-9648-3
Silverstein M. (2000), “In Defense of Happiness: A Response to the Experience Machine,” Social Theory and Practice 26(3), 279-300. https://doi.org/10.5840/soctheorpract200026225
Singer P. (1972), “Famine, Affluence, and Morality,” Philosophy and Public Affairs 1, 229-243.
Sorrell T. (2017), “Experimental Philosophy and the History of Philosophy,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 26(5): 829-849. https://doi.org/10.1080/09608788.2017.1320971
Sripada C. S., Stanley J. (2012), “Empirical Tests of Interest-Relative Invariantism,” Episteme 9(1), 3-26. https://doi.org/10.1017/epi.2011.2
Stewart J. A. (1876), “Psychology: A Science or a Method?,” Mind 1, 445-451. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/os-1.4.445
Stich S. (1988), “Reflective Equilibrium, Analytic Epistemology and the Problem of Cognitive Diversity,” Synthese 74, 391-413. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00869637
Stotz K., Griffiths P. E., Knight R. (2004), “How Biologists Conceptualize Genes: An Empirical Study,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 35, 647-673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2004.09.005
Sytsma J. (2010), “The Proper Province of Philosophy: Conceptual Analysis and Empirical Investigation,” Review of Philosophy and Psychology 1(3), 427-445. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-010-0032-1
Sytsma J., Livengood J. (2012), “Experimental Philosophy and Philosophical Disputes,” Essays in Philosophy 13(1), 145-161. https://doi.org/10.5840/eip20121319
Sytsma J., Livengood J. (2019), “On Experimental Philosophy and the History of Philosophy: A Reply to Sorrell,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 27(3): 635-647. https://doi.org/10.1080/09608788.2018.1539946
Tarski A. (1933/1983), “The Concept of Truth in Formalized Languages” [in:] Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics, J. Woodger (ed.), Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing, 152-278.
Tarski A. (1944), “The Semantic Conception of Truth and the Foundations of Semantics,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 4, 341-375. https://doi.org/10.2307/2102968
Ulatowski J. (2016), “Ordinary Truth in Tarski and Næss” [in:] Uncovering Facts and Values, J. Odrowąż-Sypniewska, A. Kuźniar (eds.), Leiden: Brill, 67-90. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004312654_006
Ulatowski J. (2017), Commonsense Pluralism about Truth: An Empirical Defence, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69465-8
Ulatowski J. (2018), “Is There a Commonsense Conception of Truth?,” Philosophia 46(4), 487-500. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-017-9941-x
Ulatowski J. (ms.), “Canberra Planning in Norwegian Wood: Experimental Work at the Antipodes,” University of Waikato.
Urmson J. O., Quine W. V. O., and Hampshire S. (1969), “A Symposium on Austin’s Method” [in:] Symposium on J. L. Austin, K. T. Fann (ed.), London: Routledge, 76-97.
Vohs K. D., Schooler J. W. (2008), “The Value of Believing in Free Will: Encouraging a Belief in Determinism Increases Cheating,” Psychological Science 19, 49-54. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02045.x
Warnock G. (1969), “John Langshaw Austin: A Biographical Sketch” [in:] Symposium on J. L. Austin, K. T. Fann (ed.), London: Routledge, 3-21.
Weijers D. (2014), “Nozick’s Experience Machine Is Dead, Long Live the Experience Machine,” Philosophical Psychology 27(4), 513-535. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2012.757889
Weinberg J. M. (2016a), “Intuitions” [in:] Oxford Handbook of Philosophical Methodology, H. Cappelen, T. Szabo Gendler, J. Hawthorne (eds.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 287-308. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199668779.013.25
Weinberg J. M. (2016b), “Going Positive by Going Negative: On Keeping X-Phi Relevant and Dangerous” [in:] A Companion to Experimental Philosophy, W. Buckwalter, J. Sytsma (eds.), Oxford: Wiley, 71-86. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118661666.ch5
Weinberg J. M., Alexander J., Gonnerman C., Reuter S. (2012), “Restrictionism and Reflection: Challenge Deflected, or Simply Redirected?,” The Monist 95, 200-222. https://doi.org/10.5840/monist201295212
Weinberg J., Nichols S., Stich S. (2001), “Normativity and Epistemic Intuitions,” Philosophical Topics 29, 429-460. https://doi.org/10.5840/philtopics2001291/217
Werner K. (2020), “Philosophical Intuition Is the Capacity to Recognize One’s Epistemic Position: An Old-Fashion Approach Based on Russell, Carnap, Wittgenstein, and Husserl,” Philosophia 48(1): 1725-1751. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-020-00195-5
Williamson T. (1994), Vagueness, London: Routledge.
Williamson T. (2000), Knowledge and Its Limits, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Williamson T. (2005), “Armchair Philosophy, Metaphysical Modality, and Counterfactual Thinking,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 105, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0066-7373.2004.00100.x
Williamson T. (2007), The Philosophy of Philosophy, Oxford: Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470696675
Woolfolk R. (2013), “Experimental Philosophy: A Methodological Critique,” Metaphilosophy 44(1-2): 79-87. https://doi.org/10.1111/meta.12016
Żuradzki T., Wiśniowska K. (2020), “A Data-Driven Argument in Bioethics: Why Theologically Grounded Concepts May Not Provide the Necessary Intellectual Resources to Discuss Inequality and Injustice in Healthcare Contexts,” American Journal of Bioethics 20(12): 25-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2020.1832617
Adams F., Steadman A. (2004b), “Intentional Actions and Moral Considerations: Still Pragmatic,” Analysis 64(3), 268-276. https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/64.3.268
Alexander J. (2016), “Philosophical Expertise” [in:] A Companion to Experimental Philosophy, W. Buckwalter, J. Sytsma (eds.), Oxford: Wiley, 555-567. https://doi.org//10.1002/9781118661666.ch39
Alexander J., Weinberg J. (2006), “Analytic Epistemology and Experimental Philosophy,” Philosophy Compass 2, 56-80. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-9991.2006.00048.x
Alxatib S., Pelletier F. J. (2011), “The Psychology of Vagueness: Borderline Cases and Contradictions,” Mind and Language 26, 287-326. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.2011.01419.x
Andow J. (2020), “Fully Experimental Conceptual Engineering,” Inquiry, 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2020.1850339
Asay J. (2021), “Primitivism about Truth” [in:] The Nature of Truth: Classic and Contemporary Perspectives, N. Kellen, J. Kim, M. P. Lynch, J. Wyatt (eds.), 2nd ed., Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 525-538.
Austin J. L. (1979), “A Plea for Excuses” [in:] Philosophical Papers, J. O. Urmson, G. J. Warnock (eds.), Oxford: Clarendon Press, 175-203. https://doi.org/10.1093/019283021X.003.0008
Balaguer M. (2016), “Conceptual Analysis and X-Phi,” Synthese 193: 2367-2388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-015-0848-4
Barnard R., Ulatowski J. (2016), “Tarski’s 1944 Polemical Remarks and Næss’ ‘Experimental Philosophy’,” Erkenntnis 81(4), 457-477. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-015-9750-1
Barnard R., Ulatowski J., Weinberg J. (2017), “Thinking about the Liar, Fast and Slow” [in:] Reflections on the Liar, B. Armour-Garb (ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 39-70. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199896042.003.0003
Barwise J., Etchemendy J. (1987), The Liar: An Essay on Truth and Circularity, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Baz A. (2018), The Crisis of Method in Contemporary Analytic Philosophy, Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198801887.001.0001
Black M. (ed.) (1950), Philosophical Analysis: A Collection of Essays, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Block N., Stalnaker R. (1999), “Conceptual Analysis, Dualism, and the Explanatory Gap,” Philosophical Review 108, 1-46. https://doi.org/10.2307/2998259
Bonini N., Osherson D., Viale R., Williamson T. (1999), “On the Psychology of Vague Predicates,” Mind and Language 14, 377-393. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0017.00117
Buckland L., Lindauer M., Rodriguez-Arias D., Véliz C. (forthcoming), “Testing the Motivational Strength of Positive and Negative Duty Arguments Regarding Global Poverty,” Review of Philosophy and Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-021-00555-4
Buckwalter W. (2010), “Knowledge Isn’t Closed on Saturday: A Study in Ordinary Language,” Review of Philosophy and Psychology 1, 395-406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-010-0030-3
Buttelmann D., Buttelmann F., Carpenter M., Call J., Tomasello M. (2017), “Great Apes Distinguish True from False Beliefs in an Interactive Helping Task,” PLoS ONE 12(4): e0173793. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173793
Buttelmann D., Carpenter M., Tomasello M. (2009), “Eighteen-Month-Old Infants Show False Belief Understanding in an Active Helping Paradigm,” Cognition 112, 337-343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2009.05.006
Carnap R. (1955), “Meaning and Synonymy in Natural Languages,” Philosophical Studies 6(3): 33-47. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02330951
Chapman S. (2011), “Arne Næss and Empirical Semantics,” Inquiry 54(1), 18-30. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2011.542946
Chapman S. (2018), “The Experimental and the Empirical: Arne Næss’ Statistical Approach to Philosophy,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 26, 961-981. https://doi.org/10.1080/09608788.2017.1336075
Cullen S. (2010), “Survey-Driven Romanticism,” Review of Philosophy and Psychology 1(3): 275-296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-009-0016-1
Cushman F. (2007), “The Effect of Moral Judgment on Causal and Intentional Attribution: What We Say, or How We Think?,” unpublished manuscript, Harvard University.
DeBrigard F. (2010), “If You Like It, Does It Matter If It’s Real?,” Philosophical Psychology 23(1), 43-57. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515080903532290
Daniels N. (1979), “Wide Reflective Equilibrium and Theory Acceptance in Ethics,” Journal of Philosophy 76(5), 256-282. https://doi.org/10.2307/2025881
DeRose K. (2005), “The Ordinary Language Basis for Contextualism, and the New Invariantism,” Philosophical Quarterly 55, 172-198. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0031-8094.2005.00394.x
Deutsch M. (2015), The Myth of the Intuitive, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262028950.001.0001
Egré P., Zehr J. (2018), “Are Gaps Preferred to Gluts? A Closer Look at Borderline Contradictions” [in:] The Semantics of Gradability, Vagueness, and Scale Structure,
E. Castroviejo, L. McNally, G. Weidman Sassoon (eds.), Dordrecht: Springer, 25-58. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77791-7_2
Feltz A., Zapertine C. (2010), “Do You Know More When It Matters Less?,” Philosophical Psychology 23(5), 683-706. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2010.514572
Fischer E. (2014), “Verbal Fallacies and Philosophical Intuitions: The Continuing Relevance of Ordinary Language Analysis” [in:] Austin on Language, B. Garvey (ed.), Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, 124-140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-019-02081-4
Fischer E., Engelhardt P., Horvath J., Ohtani H. (2019), “Experimental Ordinary Language Philosophy: A Cross-linguistic Study of Defeasible Default Inferences,” Synthese 198(2): 1029-1070. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-019-02081-4
Fraser A. (1891), “Visualization as a Chief Source of the Psychology of Hobbes, Locke, Berkeley, and Hume,” The American Journal of Psychology 4, 230-247. https://doi.org/10.2307/1411269
Fraser A. (1893), “The Psychological Basis of Hegelism,” The American Journal of Psychology 5, 472-495. https://doi.org/10.2307/1411914
Gendler T. (2000), “The Puzzle of Imaginative Resistance,” The Journal of Philosophy 97, 55-81. https://doi.org/10.2307/2678446
Gerken M., Beebe J. R. (2016), “Knowledge In and Out of Contrast,” Noûs 50, 133-164. https://doi.org/10.1111/nous.12064
Goldman A. (1979), “What is Justified Belief?” [in:] Justification and Knowledge, G. Pappas (ed.), The Hague: Reidel. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9493-5_1
Gonnerman C., Ulatowski J., Sytsma J. (forthcoming), “The History and Philosophy of Experimental Philosophy” [in:] Complete Compendium of Experimental Philosophy, M. Bauer (ed.), New York: Continuum.
Goodman N. (1983), Fact, Fiction, and Forecast, 4th ed., Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Greene J. (2008), “The Secret Joke of Kant’s Soul” [in:] Moral Psychology, vol. 3: The Neuroscience of Morality: Emotion, Brain Disorders, and Development, W. Sinnott-Armstrong (ed.), Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 35-79.
Greene J. (2013), Moral Tribes: Emotion, Reason, and the Gap Between Us and Them, New York: Penguin.
Hansen N., Chemla E. (2015), “Linguistic Experiments and Ordinary Language Philosophy,” Ratio 28(4), 422-445. https://doi.org/10.1111/rati.12112
Hansen N., Porter J. D., Francis K. (2019), “A Corpus Study of ‘Know’: On the Verification of Philosophers’ Frequency Claims about Language,” Episteme, 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1017/epi.2019.15
Hewitt S. (2010), “What Do Our Intuitions about the Experience Machine Really Tell Us about Hedonism?,” Philosophical Studies 151(3), 331-349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-009-9440-4
Horowitz T. (1998), “Philosophical Intuitions and Psychological Theory,” Ethics 108, 367-385. https://doi.org/10.1086/233809
Horne Z., Livengood J. (2017), “Ordering Effects, Updating Effects, and the Specter of Global Skepticism,” Synthese 194, 1189-1218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-015-0985-9
Horschler D. J., MacLean E. L., Santos L. R. (2020), “Do Non-human Primates Really Represent Others’ Beliefs?,” Trends in Cognitive Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2020.05.009
Horvath J. (2010), “How (Not) to React to Experimental Philosophy,” Philosophical Psychology 23(4), 447-480. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2010.505878
Ichikawa J. (2009), “Explaining Away Intuitions,” Studia Philosophica Estonica 2, 94-116. https://doi.org/10.12697/spe.2009.2.2.06
Irikefe P. O. (2020), “A Fresh Look at the Expertise Reply to the Variation Problem,” Philosophical Psychology 33, 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2020.1761541
Jackson F. (1998), From Metaphysics to Ethics: A Defence of Conceptual Analysis, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jago M. (2018), What is Truth?, Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198823810.001.0001
Kahneman D., Tversky A. (1982), “The Psychology of Preferences,” Scientific American 246, 136-142. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0182-160
Kelly D. (2011), Yuck! The Nature and Moral Significance of Disgust, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/8303.001.0001
Kelly D. (2018), “Cast in a Bad Light or Reflected in a Dark Mirror? Cognitive Science and the Projecting Mind” [in:] The Moral Psychology of Disgust, N. Strohminger, V. Kumar (eds.), London: Routledge, 171-194.
Kim M., Yuan Y. (2015), “No Cross-cultural Differences in the Gettier Car Case Intuition: A Replication Study of Weinberg et al. 2001,” Episteme 12(3): 355-361. https://doi.org/10.1017/epi.2015.17
Kneer M., Colaço D., Alexander J., Machery E. (forthcoming), “On Second Thought: Reflections on the Reflection Defense” [in:] Oxford Studies in Experimental Philosophy, J. Knobe, S. Nichols, T. Gendler (eds.), Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Knetsch J. L. (1989), “The Endowment Effect and Evidence of Nonreversible Indifference Curves,” American Economic Review 79, 1277-1284.
Knobe J. (2003). “Intentional Action and Side Effects in Ordinary Language,” Analysis 63(3), 190-193. https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/63.3.190
Knobe J. (2004), “Intention, Intentional Action and Moral Considerations,” Analysis 64(2), 181-187. https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/64.2.181
Knobe J. (2016), “Experimental Philosophy is Cognitive Science” [in:] A Companion to Experimental Philosophy, W. Buckwalter, J. Sytsma (eds.), Oxford: Wiley, 37-52. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118661666.ch3
Koch S. (2019), “Carnapian Explications, Experimental Philosophy, and Fruitful Concepts,” Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 62(6), 700-717. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2019.1567381
Koch S. (2020), “Engineering What? On Concepts in Conceptual Engineering,” Synthese 199, 1955-1975. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-020-02868-w
Kripke S. (1980), Naming and Necessity, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Lillehammer H. (ed.) (forthcoming), The Trolley Problem, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lindauer M. (2020), “Experimental Philosophy and the Fruitfulness of Normative Concepts,” Philosophical Studies 177(8), 2129-2152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-019-01302-3
Machery E. (2008), “The Folk Concept of Intentional Action: Philosophical and Experimental Issues,” Mind and Language 23(2), 165-189. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.2007.00336.x
Machery E., Mallon R., Nichols S., Stich S. P. (2004), “Semantics, Cross-Cultural Style,” Cognition 92, B1-B12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2003.10.003
Machery E., Stich S., Rose D., Chatterjee A., Karasawa K., Struchiner N., Sirker S., Usui N., Hashimoto T. (2017), “Gettier across Cultures,” Noûs 51(3), 645-664. https://doi.org/10.1111/nous.12110
Maudlin T. (2008), Truth and Paradox: Solving the Riddles, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
May J., Sinnott-Armstrong W., Hull J. G., Zimmerman A. (2010), “Practical Interests, Relevant Alternatives, and Knowledge Attributions: An Empirical Study,” Review of Philosophy and Psychology 1(2), 265-273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-009-0014-3
McKenna M., Pereboom D. (2014), Free Will: A Contemporary Introduction, London: Routledge.
Meskin A., Weinberg J. (2012), “Imagination Unblocked” [in:] The Aesthetic Mind: Philosophy and Psychology, E. Schellekens, P. Goldie (eds.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 239-253. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199691517.003.0014
Moore J. (1939), Review of A. Næss: “Truth” as Conceived by Those Who Are Not Professional Philosophers, The American Journal of Psychology 52, 489-490. https://doi.org/10.2307/1416771
Nadelhoffer T., Nahmias E., Morris S., Turner J. (2004). “The Phenomenology of Free Will,” Journal of Consciousness Studies 11(7-8), 162-179.
Nadelhoffer T., Nahmias E. (2007), “The Past and Future of Experimental Philosophy,” Philosophical Explorations 10, 123-149. https://doi.org/10.1080/13869790701305921
Nadelhoffer T., Shepard J., Crone D. L., Everett J. A. C., Earp B. D., Levy N. (2020), “Does Encouraging a Belief in Determinism Increase Cheating? Reconsidering the Value of Believing in Free Will,” Cognition 203, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104342
Nado J. (2014), “Philosophical Expertise,” Philosophy Compass 9, 631-641. https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12154
Nado J. (2015), “Philosophical Expertise and Scientific Expertise,” Philosophical Psychology 28, 1026-1044. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2014.961186
Nado J. (2017), “How To Think About Philosophical Methodology,” Journal of Indian Council of Philosophical Research 34, 447-463. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40961-017-0116-8
Nado J. (2021), “Conceptual Engineering via Experimental Philosophy,” Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 64(1-2), 76-96. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2019.1667870
Næss A. (1938a), “Truth” as Conceived by Those Who Are Not Professional Philosophers (Skrifter Utgitt av Det Norske Videnskaps-Akademi I Oslo Il. Hist.-Filos. Klass 1938 No. 4), Oslo: I Komisjon Hos Jacob Dybwad.
Næss A. (1938b), “Common-Sense and Truth,” Theoria 4, 39-58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-2567.1938.tb00438.x
Næss A. (1953), “Toward a Theory of Interpretation and Preciseness,” Theoria 15, 220-241. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-2567.1949.tb00152.x
Nagel E. (1939), Review of: A. Næss, “Truth” as Conceived by Those Who Are Not Professional Philosophers, Journal of Philosophy 36, 78-80. https://doi.org/10.2307/2017766
Nahmias E., Morris S., Nadelhoffer T., Turner J. (2006), “Is Incompatibilism Intuitive?,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 73(1), 28-53. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1933-1592.2006.tb00603.x
Nichols S., Knobe J. (2007), “Moral Responsibility and Determinism: The Cognitive Science of Folk Intuitions,” Noûs 41(4), 663-685. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0068.2007.00666.x
Nichols S., Roskies A. (2008), “Bringing Moral Responsibility Down to Earth,” The Journal of Philosophy 105(7), 371-388. https://doi.org/10.5840/jphil2008105737
Nichols S., Ulatowski J. (2007), “Intuitions and Individual Differences: The Knobe Effect Revisited,” Mind and Language 22(3), 346-365. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.2007.00312.x
Nozick R. (1974), Anarchy, State, and Utopia, New York: Basic Books.
Nozick R. (1989), The Examined Life, New York: Touchstone Books.
Paprzycka-Hausman K. (2015), “The Omissions Account of the Knobe Effect and the Asymmetry Challenge,” Mind and Language 30(5), 550-571. https://doi.org/10.1111/mila.12090
Paul L. (2010), “A New Role for Experimental Work in Metaphysics,” Review of Philosophy and Psychology 1, 461-476. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-010-0034-z
Pinder M. (2017a), “The Explication Defence of Arguments from Reference,” Erkenntnis 82(6), 1253-1276. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-016-9868-9
Pinder M. (2017b), “Does Experimental Philosophy Have a Role to Play in Carnapian Explication?,” Ratio 30(4), 443-461. https://doi.org/10.1111/rati.12164
Pinillos N. Á., Smith N., Nair G. S., Marchetto P., Mun C. (2011), “Philosophy’s New Challenge: Experiments and Intentional Action,” Mind and Language 26, 115-139. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.2010.01412.x
Plakias A. (2015), “Experimental Philosophy,” Oxford Handbook Online, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199935314.013.17
Priest G. (1997), “Sylvan’s Box: A Short Story and Ten Morals,” Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 38, 573-582. https://doi.org/10.1305/ndjfl/1039540770
Rawls J. (1971), A Theory of Justice, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rini R. (2015), “How Not to Test for Expertise,” Synthese 192, 431-452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-014-0579-y
Ripley D. (2011), “Contradictions at the Borders” [in:] Vagueness in Communication, R. Nouwen, R. an Rooij, U. Sauerland, H-C. Schmitz (eds.), Dordrecht: Springer, 169-188. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-18446-8_10
Ripley D. (2016), “Experimental Philosophical Logic” [in:] A Companion to Experimental Philosophy, W. Buckwalter, J. Sytsma (eds.), Oxford: Wiley, 523-534. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118661666.ch36
Rose D. (2015), “Belief is Prior to Knowledge,” Episteme 12(3), 385-399. https://doi.org/10.1017/epi.2015.21
Rowland R. (2017), “Our Intuitions about the Experience Machine,” Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 12, 110-117. https://doi.org/10.26556/jesp.v12i1.216
Russell B. (1923), “Vagueness,” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 1, 84-92. https://doi.org/10.1080/00048402308540623
Samuelson W., Zeckhauser R. (1988), “Status Quo Bias in Decision Making,” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 1(1), 7-59. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00055564
Schubach J. (2017), “Explanatory Explication,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 94(3), 672-710. https://doi.org/10.1111/phpr.12207
Schubach J. (2018), “Robustness Analysis as Explanatory Reasoning,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 69, 275-300. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axw008
Schwitzgebel E. (2009), “Do Ethicists Steal More Books?,” Philosophical Psychology 22, 711-725. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515080903409952
Schwitzgebel E., Cokelet B., Singer P. (forthcoming), “Do Ethics Classes Influence Student Behavior? Case Study: Teaching the Ethics of Eating Meat,” Cognition.
Schwitzgebel E., Rust J. (2012), “The Behavior of Ethicists” [in:] A Companion to Experimental Philosophy, W. Buckwalter, J. Sytsma (eds.), Oxford: Wiley, 225-233. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118661666.ch15
Schwitzgebel E., Rust J., Huang L., Moore A., Coates J. (2012), “Ethicists’ Courtesy at Philosophy Conferences,” Philosophical Psychology 35, 331-340. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2011.580524
Shearman A. T. (1907), “Intuition,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 7, 158-197. https://doi.org/10.1093/aristotelian/7.1.158
Shepherd J., Justus J. (2015), “X-Phi and Carnapian Explication,” Erkenntnis 80(2), 381-402. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-014-9648-3
Silverstein M. (2000), “In Defense of Happiness: A Response to the Experience Machine,” Social Theory and Practice 26(3), 279-300. https://doi.org/10.5840/soctheorpract200026225
Singer P. (1972), “Famine, Affluence, and Morality,” Philosophy and Public Affairs 1, 229-243.
Sorrell T. (2017), “Experimental Philosophy and the History of Philosophy,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 26(5): 829-849. https://doi.org/10.1080/09608788.2017.1320971
Sripada C. S., Stanley J. (2012), “Empirical Tests of Interest-Relative Invariantism,” Episteme 9(1), 3-26. https://doi.org/10.1017/epi.2011.2
Stewart J. A. (1876), “Psychology: A Science or a Method?,” Mind 1, 445-451. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/os-1.4.445
Stich S. (1988), “Reflective Equilibrium, Analytic Epistemology and the Problem of Cognitive Diversity,” Synthese 74, 391-413. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00869637
Stotz K., Griffiths P. E., Knight R. (2004), “How Biologists Conceptualize Genes: An Empirical Study,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 35, 647-673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2004.09.005
Sytsma J. (2010), “The Proper Province of Philosophy: Conceptual Analysis and Empirical Investigation,” Review of Philosophy and Psychology 1(3), 427-445. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-010-0032-1
Sytsma J., Livengood J. (2012), “Experimental Philosophy and Philosophical Disputes,” Essays in Philosophy 13(1), 145-161. https://doi.org/10.5840/eip20121319
Sytsma J., Livengood J. (2019), “On Experimental Philosophy and the History of Philosophy: A Reply to Sorrell,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 27(3): 635-647. https://doi.org/10.1080/09608788.2018.1539946
Tarski A. (1933/1983), “The Concept of Truth in Formalized Languages” [in:] Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics, J. Woodger (ed.), Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing, 152-278.
Tarski A. (1944), “The Semantic Conception of Truth and the Foundations of Semantics,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 4, 341-375. https://doi.org/10.2307/2102968
Ulatowski J. (2016), “Ordinary Truth in Tarski and Næss” [in:] Uncovering Facts and Values, J. Odrowąż-Sypniewska, A. Kuźniar (eds.), Leiden: Brill, 67-90. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004312654_006
Ulatowski J. (2017), Commonsense Pluralism about Truth: An Empirical Defence, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69465-8
Ulatowski J. (2018), “Is There a Commonsense Conception of Truth?,” Philosophia 46(4), 487-500. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-017-9941-x
Ulatowski J. (ms.), “Canberra Planning in Norwegian Wood: Experimental Work at the Antipodes,” University of Waikato.
Urmson J. O., Quine W. V. O., and Hampshire S. (1969), “A Symposium on Austin’s Method” [in:] Symposium on J. L. Austin, K. T. Fann (ed.), London: Routledge, 76-97.
Vohs K. D., Schooler J. W. (2008), “The Value of Believing in Free Will: Encouraging a Belief in Determinism Increases Cheating,” Psychological Science 19, 49-54. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02045.x
Warnock G. (1969), “John Langshaw Austin: A Biographical Sketch” [in:] Symposium on J. L. Austin, K. T. Fann (ed.), London: Routledge, 3-21.
Weijers D. (2014), “Nozick’s Experience Machine Is Dead, Long Live the Experience Machine,” Philosophical Psychology 27(4), 513-535. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2012.757889
Weinberg J. M. (2016a), “Intuitions” [in:] Oxford Handbook of Philosophical Methodology, H. Cappelen, T. Szabo Gendler, J. Hawthorne (eds.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 287-308. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199668779.013.25
Weinberg J. M. (2016b), “Going Positive by Going Negative: On Keeping X-Phi Relevant and Dangerous” [in:] A Companion to Experimental Philosophy, W. Buckwalter, J. Sytsma (eds.), Oxford: Wiley, 71-86. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118661666.ch5
Weinberg J. M., Alexander J., Gonnerman C., Reuter S. (2012), “Restrictionism and Reflection: Challenge Deflected, or Simply Redirected?,” The Monist 95, 200-222. https://doi.org/10.5840/monist201295212
Weinberg J., Nichols S., Stich S. (2001), “Normativity and Epistemic Intuitions,” Philosophical Topics 29, 429-460. https://doi.org/10.5840/philtopics2001291/217
Werner K. (2020), “Philosophical Intuition Is the Capacity to Recognize One’s Epistemic Position: An Old-Fashion Approach Based on Russell, Carnap, Wittgenstein, and Husserl,” Philosophia 48(1): 1725-1751. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-020-00195-5
Williamson T. (1994), Vagueness, London: Routledge.
Williamson T. (2000), Knowledge and Its Limits, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Williamson T. (2005), “Armchair Philosophy, Metaphysical Modality, and Counterfactual Thinking,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 105, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0066-7373.2004.00100.x
Williamson T. (2007), The Philosophy of Philosophy, Oxford: Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470696675
Woolfolk R. (2013), “Experimental Philosophy: A Methodological Critique,” Metaphilosophy 44(1-2): 79-87. https://doi.org/10.1111/meta.12016
Żuradzki T., Wiśniowska K. (2020), “A Data-Driven Argument in Bioethics: Why Theologically Grounded Concepts May Not Provide the Necessary Intellectual Resources to Discuss Inequality and Injustice in Healthcare Contexts,” American Journal of Bioethics 20(12): 25-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2020.1832617
Downloads
Published
2021-06-30
How to Cite
Barnard, R., Ulatowski, J., & Weinberg, J. M. (2021). The Fourfold Route to Empirical Enlightenment: Experimental Philosophy’s Adolescence and the Changing Body of Work. The Philosophy of Science, 29(2), 77–113. https://doi.org/10.14394/filnau.2021.0012
Issue
Section
Articles
Filozofia Nauki/The Philosophy of Science | ISSN 1230-6894 | e-ISSN 2657-5868