In the Maze of Philosophical Distinctions: Paweł Rojek’s Systematization of the Basic Issues Concerning Tropes and Universals

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14394/filnau.2020.0011

Keywords:

Paweł Rojek, tropes, universals

Abstract

This paper reviews Paweł Rojek’s book Tropy i uniwersalia: Badania ontologiczne (Tropes and Universals: Ontological Investigations). The subject of the book are the titular notions of tropes (i.e., abstract particulars) and universals. The first three chapters contain conceptual clarifications and the remaining three chapters are devoted to the interpretation of particular philosophers (Roman Ingarden, Thomas Aquinas, Hegel, and George Frederick Stout) in the light of the previously introduced distinctions. The review summarizes each chapter and discusses some objections to the author’s theses.

References

Piwowarczyk M. (2020), Platonizm a spór o uniwersalia. W związku z książką Pawła Rojka Tropy i uniwersalia, „Filozofia Nauki” 28(2) [110], 113-133. https://doi.org/10.14394/filnau.2020.0012
Rojek P. (2019), Tropy i uniwersalia. Badania ontologiczne, Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Semper.

Published

2020-06-26

How to Cite

Luc, J. (2020). In the Maze of Philosophical Distinctions: Paweł Rojek’s Systematization of the Basic Issues Concerning Tropes and Universals. The Philosophy of Science, 28(2), 99–111. https://doi.org/10.14394/filnau.2020.0011