Myśl i prawda. Bradleyowska koncepcja prawdy i jej teoretyczne podstawy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14394/filnau.2023.0005Słowa kluczowe:
idealism, monism, truth, identity theory of truth, British idealism, Francis H. BradleyAbstrakt
The purpose of this paper is to examine and discuss the theory of truth developed by Francis Herbert Bradley in the context of his logical and metaphysical views. The British idealist’s reflections on truth were not contained in a single work, but are found in many of his works, which makes it somewhat difficult to understand his concepts adequately and, as I show, has led to a misinterpretation of his views. In this paper, I analyze and identify the logical and metaphysical foundations of his theory, focusing mainly on his two most important works: Appearance and Reality – his most significant metaphysical work – and The Principles of Logic – his main work on logic. In order to adequately understand the Oxford idealist’s position that truth is something that concerns the relationship between logical judgment and reality, I examine especially his conception of judgment contained in The Principles of Logic and his conception of reality developed in Appearance and Reality. As early as 1883, in The Principles of Logic, Bradley distinguished between a surfaced grammatical sentence and an implicit logical form of judgment. On this basis, I point out that Bradley’s theory should not be classified – as has not infrequently been attributed to him – as a coherence theory, but that it is in fact an identity theory. I also point out that Bradley’s adversaries, such as Bertrand Russell, have misunderstood his theory.
Bibliografia
Ajdukiewicz K. (2011), Główne kierunki filozofii, Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Semper.
Allard J. W. (2005), The Logical Foundations of Bradley’s Metaphysics, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Baldwin T. (1991), The Identity Theory of Truth, „Mind New Series” 100(1), 35-52. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/C.397.35
Baldwin T. (2018), Truth in British Idealism and its Analytic Critics [w:] The Oxford Handbook of Truth, M. Glanzberg (red.), New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199557929.013.5
Beiser F. C. (2008), German Idealism: The Struggle against Subjectivism, London–Cambridge: Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjghtq5
Blackburn S. (1992), Spreading The Word, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Bosanquet B. (1911), Logic or The Morphology of Knowledge, t. I, Oxford: Clarendon Press. https://doi.org/10.1037/13765-000
Bradley F. H. (1916), Appearance and Reality, London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd.
Bradley F. H. (1950), The Principles of Logic, t. I, London: Oxford University Press.
Bradley F. H. (1996), Zjawisko a rzeczywistość, tłum. J. Szymura, Toruń: Wydawnictwo Comer.
Bradley F. H. (1962a), On Truth and Coherence [w:] Essays on Truth and Reality, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 202-218.
Bradley F. H. (1962b), On Truth and Copying [w:] Essays on Truth and Reality, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 107-126.
Candlish S. (1989), The Truth about F. H. Bradley, „Mind” 89(391), 331-348. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/XCVIII.391.331
Candlish S. (1995), Resurrecting the Identity Theory of Truth, „Bradley Studies” 1, 116-123. https://doi.org/10.5840/bradley19951211
Candlish S. (1999), A Prolegomenon to an Identity Theory of Truth, „Philosophy” 74(288), 199-220. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031819199000261
Candlish S. (2007), The Russell/Bradley Dispute and its Significance for Twentieth Century Philosophy, New York: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230800618
Candlish S., Damnjanovic N. (2007), A Brief History of Truth [w:] Handbook of the Philosophy of Science, t. 5: Philosophy of Logic, D. Jacquette (red.), Amsterdam: Elsevier, 273-369. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-044451541-4/50012-9
Candlish S., Damnjanovic N. (2018), The Identity Theory of Truth [w:] The Oxford Handbook of Truth, M. Glanzberg (red.), New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199557929.013.10
Cartwright R. (1987), A Neglected Theory of Truth [w:] Philosophical Essays, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Church R. W. (1942), Bradley’s Dialectic, London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd.
Descartes R. (2010), Medytacje o pierwszej filozofii, tłum. M. Ajdukiewicz, K. Ajdukiewicz, Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
Dodd J. (2008), An Identity Theory of Truth, New York: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230584266
Eliot T. S. (1964), Knowledge and Experience, London: Faber and Faber.
Frege G. (1977a), Sens i znaczenie [w:] Pisma semantyczne, tłum. B. Wolniewicz, Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe, 60-88.
Frege G. (1977b), Myśl. Studium logiczne [w:] Pisma semantyczne, tłum. B. Wolniewicz, Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe, 101-129.
Frege G. (1997), Podstawy arytmetyki. Logiczno-matematyczne badania nad pojęciem liczby [w:] Próby gramatyki filozoficznej. Antologia, tłum. i oprac. K. Rotter, Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego, 45-85.
Haack S. (1978), Philosophy of Logics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511812866
Hegel G. W. F. (1963), Fenomenologia ducha, t. 1, tłum. A. Landman, Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.
Holdcroft D. (1984), Holism and Truth [w:] The Philosophy of F. H. Bradley, A. Manser, G. Stock (red.), Oxford: Clarendon Press, 191-209.
Hornsby J. (1997), Truth: The Identity Theory, „Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society” 97(1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9264.00001
Hylton P. (1992), Russell, Idealism, and the Emergence of Analytic Philosophy, Oxford: Clarendon Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/019824018X.001.0001
Joachim H. H. (1906), The Nature of Truth, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Joachim H. H. (1948), Logical Studies, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Mander W. J. (2011), British Idealism: A History, New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199559299.001.0001
Manser A. (1983), Bradley’s Logic, Oxford: Blackwell.
Moore G. E. (1899), The Nature of Judgment, „Mind” 8(30), 176-193. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/VIII.2.176
Parmenides (2001), ΠΕΡΙ ΦΥΣΕΩΣ (O Naturze), tłum. M. Wesoły, „Przegląd Filozoficzny – Nowa Seria” 2(38), 71-85.
Passmore J. (1957), A Hundred Years of Philosophy, London: Gerald Duckworth & Co.
Passmore J. (1969), Russell and Bradley [w:] Contemporary Philosophy in Australia, London: George Allen & Unwins.
Quine W. V. O. (1969), O tym, co istnieje [w:] Z punktu widzenia logiki. Eseje logiczno-filozoficzne, tłum. B. Stanosz, Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.
Rescher N. (1973), The Coherence Theory of Truth, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Rodriguez-Consuegra F. (1999), Bradley, Frege and Relatedness, „Bradley Studies” 5(2), 113-125. https://doi.org/10.5840/bradley1999527
Russell B. (1966), The Monistic Theory of Truth [w:] Philosophical Essays, London–New York: Routledge, 131-146.
Russell B. (1995), Problemy filozofii, tłum. W. Sady, Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
Russell B. (2000), Nasza wiedza o świecie zewnętrznym, tłum. T. Baszniak, Warszawa: Aletheia.
Schelling F. W. J. (1803), Ideen zu einer Philosophie der Natur als Einleitung in das Studium dieser Wissenschaft, Landshut: P. Krüll.
Spinoza B. (1954), Etyka w porządku geometrycznym dowiedziona, tłum. I. Myślicki, Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.
Stern R. (2004), Coherence as a Test for Truth, „Philosophy and Phenomenological Research” 69(2): 296-326. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1933-1592.2004.tb00396.x
Stirling J. H. (1898), The Secret of Hegel, Edinburg: Oliver & Boyd.
Szymura J. (1990a), O tym, jak Bertrand Russell rozprawił się z absolutnym monizmem, „Studia Filozoficzne” 2-3, 265-280.
Szymura J. (1990b), Relacje w perspektywie absolutnego monizmu F. H. Bradleya, Kraków: Nakład Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.
Wittgenstein L. (2012), Tractatus logico-philosophicus, tłum. B. Wolniewicz, Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
Woleński J. (2005), Epistemologia, Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
Wollheim R. (1969), F. H. Bradley, Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
Wolniewicz B. (2019), Rzeczy i fakty, Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
Żuchowski P. (2012), Podstawowe założenia monizmu absolutnego, „Kwartalnik Filozoficzny” 40(1), 167-189.
Pobrania
Opublikowane
Jak cytować
Numer
Dział
Licencja
Prawa autorskie (c) 2023 Alexandre Uchan
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Użycie niekomercyjne – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.